Skip to main content
£0.00 0

Basket

No products in the basket.

ASIC mining articles and advice

Lent Hill: dairy biogas gives surplus electricity a local buyer

Lent Hill Ag-Grid Digital uses electricity from manure and food-waste digestion to supply a flexible mining container. The operator reports a 300 kW grid-export limit alongside a 1 MW mining unit.

Renewables & heat reuse / project case study

New York, USAOperator reportedEvidence reviewed 29 September 2026

Lent Hill Ag-Grid Digital uses electricity from manure and food-waste digestion to supply a flexible mining container. The operator reports a 300 kW grid-export limit alongside a 1 MW mining unit. Ag-Grid project report.

Published project reference
1 MW mining unit · 300 kW export limit
Evidence date / context
Operational from October 2024
Financial evidence
Project accounts not established by the cited evidence
Comparison in this article
Explicit UK scenario per 1,000 miner kWh

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

What this project demonstrates

The binding constraint in this example is the route to market for electricity. A generator can have fuel available while its connection prevents it selling all the output. A controllable computing load offers another customer behind that limit. The capacity of the digester, engine and miner must nevertheless be considered separately.

Follow the electricity and the heat

Manure and food wastedigestion and generationsite demand, permitted export and mining

A farm model should use electricity remaining after parasitic digester loads and existing businesses. An engine’s useful heat may already be committed to digestion; adding hypothetical miner heat to the same account would overstate the benefit.

Aerial photograph of the two anaerobic digesters at Lent Hill Dairy
Ag-Grid Energy · Original source.

Mining income, heat value and running costs

The figures below are The Mining Shop’s own worked comparison for a prospective UK site. They are not the operator’s earnings, a current tariff or a forecast. All inputs are shown so you can see which conditions create or remove the benefit.

Worked scenario · not the operator’s accounts

What 1,000 kWh could contribute

1,000 kWh to miners + 50 kWh of auxiliary electricity. GBP comparison for a prospective UK site; no currency conversion of project results.

Gross mining income£80.00
Useful heat value£0.00
Electricity opportunity cost£52.50
Pool fee£1.60
Other operating allowance£10.00
Operating contribution
Before capital and omitted costs

£15.901.59p per miner kWh

The 5p/kWh rate represents the export payment forgone for electricity diverted to mining and its auxiliary equipment. It is an opportunity cost, not an additional grid-import bill. The example assumes existing generation; include new generation costs if building it specifically for mining.

Every assumption behind the chart
Gross mining income 8p per miner kWh; a scenario, not a current machine yield
Electricity 5p/kWh × 1,050 kWh = £52.50
Pool fee 2% of gross mining income
Useful heat 0% of miner electricity = 0 kWh; zero credit in this energy-only example
Other operating costs £10 per 1,000 miner kWh; placeholder allowance
Not included Equipment, installation, finance, tax, depreciation, major replacements and any costs beyond the stated allowance

The operating contribution is mining income after pool fees + useful heat value − electricity cost or export forgone − other running costs. Electricity consumed in pumps or extra fans earns no mining income in this example. Recovered heat is a second use of the same energy, not extra electricity.

Lower earnings can change the decision
Gross income per miner kWh Operating contribution
5p −£13.50
8p Chart scenario £15.90
11p £45.30
Break-even gross mining income
6.38p

per miner kWh

Maximum electricity cost / export value
6.51p

per total electricity kWh

These are alternative operating thresholds using the chart’s inputs. Capital and omitted costs would lower the supported electricity price and raise the required mining income.

Heating alternatives, annual costs and payback

If electricity genuinely has no export payment or other productive use, setting the opportunity cost to zero would improve this example by £52.50. That does not eliminate generator maintenance, revenue-sharing obligations or capital costs. No heat income has been assumed where a usable heat destination is unproven.

To turn this into an annual assessment, use the miner electricity actually expected in the profitable operating windows. Multiply the contribution by annual miner kWh ÷ 1,000 only if the assumptions remain valid in those windows, then deduct annual fixed costs. Simple payback is total installed capital divided by positive annual cash contribution; it is unavailable when that contribution is zero or negative. No project payback is claimed here because the necessary capital and operating accounts are not published in the cited evidence.

What to take into a UK project

Separate engine output, site demand and permitted export when sizing a flexible load.

Meter engine output, digester consumption, site demand, export and mining on matching intervals. Confirm which asset is actually mined and which party owns it.

Questions to resolve for your site

  • What changes if the export limit is relaxed?
  • Does the agreement pay the farm a fixed energy price or a share of mining income?

Build the decision around your own interval electricity data, the real alternative use of that power, and a heat customer with a measured demand. Choose hardware using its dated revenue estimate, efficiency and service requirements. A higher gross earning figure is only the start; useful operating margin and the installed cost determine whether the project deserves investment.

Test the same logic with your own site inputs

Compare all supported mining algorithms, electricity use and dated earning estimates. Start with zero heat credit, then add only the heat you can use or sell.

Model renewable miningCompare with grid export

Sources and original imagery

Project statements are attributed to the operator, filing, research paper or reporting listed below. Engineering interpretation and the GBP calculations are our analysis. Review date: 29 September 2026; this is a source review, not a site visit or independent audit.

  1. Ag-Grid project report

Image provenance: Ag-Grid Energy (source). Image context is recorded with each photograph.

ASIC MINER PICKS

Recommended ASIC Mining Hardware

Compare three of our highest ranked ASIC miners currently available, with live product details and pricing.
Browse all ASIC miners
MORE MINING ADVICE

More ASIC Mining Articles

Read practical advice about choosing hardware, calculating electricity costs, setting up miners, hosting and maintenance.
MINER COMMUNITY

Join the ASIC Mining Discussion

Ask a question or share what has worked for you. Your experience may help another miner make a better decision.

Members can read and join the discussion

Log in to read comments from other miners. Create a free account if you would like to ask a question or share your experience.

Log in to read comments Register to join the discussion

Membership helps us protect the discussion from spam and keep answers useful.

ASIC MINING SUPPORT

Need Help Choosing an ASIC Miner?

Tell us what you want to mine, your electricity cost and where the machine will run. We can help you compare hardware, power requirements, hosting and repairs.
Contact our mining team
Browse ASIC miners