Image: Canaan Inc., via SustainableBiz Canada · Original source. Greenhouse photograph supplied with project reporting; commissioning is not established by this image.
Renewables and heat reuse
Canaan announced a 24-month proof of concept with Bitforest. Heat from liquid cooled Avalon equipment would preheat greenhouse boiler intake water through a separate heat-exchange loop.
- Project at a glance
- 3 MW proposed · 360 servers
- Source date and context
- 6 January 2026
- Published financial detail
- The sources reviewed do not include full project accounts.
- Our comparison
- A UK example per 1,000 miner kWh
About 5 minutes to read
A proposed greenhouse pilot in Manitoba
Canaan announced the Bitforest project as a 24 month proof of concept. The proposed equipment comprises 360 liquid cooled servers and four container modules, with 3 MW of computing capacity. Delivery follows the host's notice to proceed. That distinction matters: the announcement sets out a test programme, including recovery and uptime targets, whose performance is to be confirmed in operation.
“This program will allow us to measure, model, and scale heat recovery for agriculture in colder climates.”
Preheating water before the electric boilers
Recovered heat is intended to warm the intake water for the greenhouse's electric boilers through a separate heat exchanger. The boilers would then supply the remaining temperature rise. This is a practical way to use heat that falls below the final process temperature. The useful output is the reduction in boiler demand after allowing for pumps, losses and the greenhouse's changing needs.
What the numbers could look like in the UK
The calculation below uses assumed UK prices to show how the costs fit together. It is our example, not this project’s reported earnings. Replace the inputs with current machine estimates and the costs at your own site.
Illustrative UK calculation
Income and running costs
1,000 kWh used by miners, plus 50 kWh for pumps and fans. All amounts in pounds.
Operating contributionBefore equipment and installation costs
−£9.60−0.96p per miner kWh
This example buys electricity at 12p/kWh and values useful heat at 6p/kWh. These are assumed prices. The heat value should be replaced with the actual cost of the heating you would otherwise use, or the price a customer agrees to pay.
| Mining income | 8p per miner kWh; an assumed rate, not a live earnings estimate |
|---|---|
| Electricity | 12p/kWh × 1,050 kWh = £126.00 |
| Pool fee | 2% of gross mining income |
| Useful heat | 80% of miner electricity = 800 kWh; valued at 6p per delivered kWh |
| Other running costs | £10 per 1,000 miner kWh; an allowance to replace with your own costs |
| Costs still to add | Equipment, installation, finance, tax, depreciation, major replacements and any costs above the allowance |
The contribution is what remains from mining income and useful heat after the stated running costs. It is not net profit: the equipment and other excluded costs still have to be recovered. Pumps and fans use electricity but earn no mining income in this calculation.
| Gross income per miner kWh | Without heat value | With useful heat |
|---|---|---|
| 5p | −£87.00 | −£39.00 |
| 8p Chart example | −£57.60 | −£9.60 |
| 11p | −£28.20 | £19.80 |
- Mining income needed to cover running costs
- 8.98pper miner kWh
- Highest electricity cost or export value supported
- 11.09pper total electricity kWh
These are two ways to read the same example. Adding equipment costs or a larger maintenance allowance raises the income needed and reduces the electricity price the project can afford.
Compare heating options and work out annual costs
Use the heating system you would actually choose as the comparison. For example, a heat pump using electricity at 20p/kWh with a seasonal COP of 3 has an electricity cost of about 6.67p per kWh of heat. A resistance heater at that tariff uses 20p per kWh of heat. These are calculation examples, rather than measurements from this project.
For an annual estimate, use the miner electricity expected during hours when running makes sense. Scale the contribution by annual miner kWh divided by 1,000, then deduct fixed annual costs. Recalculate if electricity prices, mining income or usable heat change.
Simple payback is the total installed cost divided by positive annual cash contribution. There is no payback under a scenario with zero or negative contribution. The sources reviewed here do not provide the full project accounts needed to calculate an actual payback for this installation.
Measure useful heat once the plant is running
Preheating can complement an existing boiler while preserving its ability to meet peak demand.
Confirm commissioning, actual miner consumption, supply and return temperatures, flow rates, boiler consumption and auxiliary loads. Compare similar weather and crop conditions.
Questions worth asking
- Has notice to proceed been given?
- Are heat payments based on recovered heat at the skid or useful heat delivered to the host?
Try your own electricity and heat figures
Compare available miners and dated earnings estimates. Include heat only where you can use it or have a customer for it.
Sources and photographs
Sources checked on 29 September 2026. Project facts and quotations come from the publications below; the UK calculations and practical assessment are The Mining Shop’s analysis. This article is based on published material, rather than a site visit.
Photographs: Canaan Inc., via SustainableBiz Canada (source).
Join the ASIC Mining Discussion
Members can read and join the discussion
Log in to read comments from other miners. Create a free account if you would like to ask a question or share your experience.
Membership helps us protect the discussion from spam and keep answers useful.